This
is a great summary of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child vs. the
Vatican by the dedicated people at BishopAccountability.org.
The
Monitor | UN Grills the Vatican: 5 Remarkable
Moments | January 17, 2014
For
six hours in Geneva, Switzerland yesterday, two Vatican officials faced the 18
human rights experts who make up the UN Committee on the Rights
of the Child, fielding a polite bombardment of pointed questions on child
sexual abuse. To help the UN Committee prepare its approach,
BishopAccountability.org submitted a letter and report; these provide, we
think, succinct and powerful overviews of the Holy See's involvement in child
sexual abuse worldwide. See our submission here.
Yesterday's hearing contained many important moments and a few revelations, not all of which were captured in news reports. We thought we'd list five that struck us as particularly significant.
1.
For the first time, the Vatican had to admit publicly that it still does not
require the reporting of child sex crimes to civil authorities. Committee
member Jorge Cardona of Spain asked, "Shouldn't the Guidelines [the
Vatican's 2011 instructions to bishops' conferences on abuse policies]
refer to the fact that in all cases crimes must be reported?" Bishop
Charles Scicluna replied, "Our guideline is to follow domestic law."
[See more on this issue in our Report.]
2.
The Committee's most repeated question? They want the data about abuse cases
that the Holy See has refused to provide. Committee chair Kirsten Sandberg of
Norway reiterated the request six times. "You
say that providing data is up to the country where the crime takes place. But
your giving out data would help ... You have these data and could provide them.
We ask again that you provide us ... the data that has been asked for." [See
our discussion of the Holy See's data in our Letter to the Committee.]
3.
The Vatican believes that it is the obligation of the individual
perpetrator, not the Church, to compensate victims, Bishop Charles Scicluna
said: "We promote personal responsibility.
The person causing the damage has the duty to compensate." (In a 2012 interview, Scicluna called civil court rulings
that the Church is liable "unfair.")
4.
The Holy See appears to have no intention to return nuncio Józef Wesołowski
to the Dominican Republic to face charges that he sexually abused
five boys there. The Holy See's Permanent Observer to the UN, Archbishop
Silvano Tomasi, said yesterday that Wesolowski will be tried
instead in the Vatican, under the city state's newly revised criminal code.
5.
Religious orders, which comprise one third to one half of the world's
Catholic clerics, still are not being compelled by the Holy See to
create abuse policies. This fact was uncovered by Committee member Cardona,
who asked about the Holy See's "Circular Letter" of May 2011. Cited
frequently by the Holy See as proof that it now "gets it," the
Circular Letter requires bishops' conferences in every country to develop
binding abuse policies. "Is it also for
religious orders? Are there instructions for Jesuits, Benedictines
...?" It pertains only to bishops' conferences, Scicluna
conceded. But "there is a section that says major superiors are 'strongly
invited'" to participate, he added.
The
Committee is the first international entity to hold the Holy See publicly
accountable for its obligations to keep children safe from sexual violence. Its
inquiry has been profoundly constructive. We look forward to its concluding
report, which is due in early February.
Warm regards,
Anne
Barrett Doyle, Co-Director
BishopAccountability.org (you can go to the website for details)
BishopAccountability.org (you can go to the website for details)
No comments:
Post a Comment